ملخص
هذا بحث بعنوان: التوقّف في الفتوى؛ يسعى الباحث من خلاله إلى التوصّل إلى حقيقة المراد من التوقّف عند المجتهدين، وأهميّته، وألفاظه، وأسبابه، وتطبيقاته، وأثره في قضية الإجماع، وقد توصّل الباحث إلى أنّ المراد بالتوقّف هو عدم إبداء قول في المسألة الاجتهادية؛ لعدم ظهور وجه الصواب فيها للمجتهد.
كما توصلت الدراسة إلى أنّ هناك أسباباً للتوقّف، وآثاراً له؛ أهمّها: مسألة هل يعدّ التوقّف مذهباً أو قولاً؟ وأثر ذلك في الإجماع، كما توصلت الدراسة أيضاً إلى أهميّة التثبّت قبل إصدار الأحكام الفقهيّة.
الكلمات المفتاحية: التوقّف، الفتوى، الاجتهاد.
Abstract
This study seeks to recognize the reality of "the abstain" according to the fatwa, and to identify its impact on their reasoning. The study has concluded that The abstain according to the Jurisprudences is not to no to say someone's opinion in such jurisprudential issue; because of non-appearance of the right solution concerning it. Also the study had detected that there are many reasons for " the abstain"; the most important of them are when the evidences don't appear vividly to the scholar, and sometimes the contradiction that occurred between the evidences, and sometimes the scholar abstains for doing more investigation and searching; when there are lot of similar things concerning the issue problem. The work have found out that there are some resulting impacts depend on "the abstain"; one of the most important of them is the inference from the opinion of the first scholar sect; in order to recognize the issue that he abstained on it. Finally; this paper research has supported the matter that Fatwa issuing is has an enormous importance; so the scholar must be sure before giving his opinion in such issue.
